The Conversation Review page provides a full drill-down into a single production session. It shows the complete message exchange, the auto-generated quality tags, the user's feedback, and the detailed execution trace, giving teams everything they need to understand what happened in a conversation and decide what action to take.
Navigate to a conversation review by clicking any row in the Observation Dashboard conversation table.

The conversation review page is organized in four sections:
The header displays the auto-tags assigned to the conversation by the LLM judge. These provide an at-a-glance quality assessment without reading the full transcript.
Alongside the tags, the header shows:
Below the header, an LLM-generated summary card condenses the conversation into a short paragraph. This allows reviewers to quickly understand the session's content and outcome without reading every turn.
The summary is generated automatically by the same batch tagging process that produces the conversation tags.
The chat history section renders the full conversation as an exchange of user and assistant messages - the same format the user experienced in production.
Where users submitted feedback during the conversation, indicators appear alongside the relevant assistant turn:
Feedback from this view is read-only. To submit feedback programmatically or from the Chat Playground, see Feedback Integration.
The trace panel exposes the execution detail behind each assistant response. For each turn it shows:

Use the trace panel to diagnose why a response was incorrect or slow - for example, to identify a tool that returned unexpected data, or an LLM call with a malformed prompt.
Click the Export button in the header to download the conversation as a ZIP archive. The export dialog offers an option to include a LUI data snapshot - a frozen copy of the customer data (mDB) at the time of the session.
| Export option | Use case |
| Without LUI data | Share the transcript for review; lightweight |
| With LUI data | Full reproducibility; recreates the exact data state |
The ZIP format is compatible with the Evaluation module's import function.
Production conversations can be imported directly into the Evaluation workspace as test cases:
This closes the quality loop - real production failures become regression tests, ensuring the same issue cannot recur undetected. See Data Snapshots and Production Import for the full workflow.
The Conversation Review page provides a full drill-down into a single production session. It shows the complete message exchange, the auto-generated quality tags, the user's feedback, and the detailed execution trace, giving teams everything they need to understand what happened in a conversation and decide what action to take.
Navigate to a conversation review by clicking any row in the Observation Dashboard conversation table.

The conversation review page is organized in four sections:
The header displays the auto-tags assigned to the conversation by the LLM judge. These provide an at-a-glance quality assessment without reading the full transcript.
Alongside the tags, the header shows:
Below the header, an LLM-generated summary card condenses the conversation into a short paragraph. This allows reviewers to quickly understand the session's content and outcome without reading every turn.
The summary is generated automatically by the same batch tagging process that produces the conversation tags.
The chat history section renders the full conversation as an exchange of user and assistant messages - the same format the user experienced in production.
Where users submitted feedback during the conversation, indicators appear alongside the relevant assistant turn:
Feedback from this view is read-only. To submit feedback programmatically or from the Chat Playground, see Feedback Integration.
The trace panel exposes the execution detail behind each assistant response. For each turn it shows:

Use the trace panel to diagnose why a response was incorrect or slow - for example, to identify a tool that returned unexpected data, or an LLM call with a malformed prompt.
Click the Export button in the header to download the conversation as a ZIP archive. The export dialog offers an option to include a LUI data snapshot - a frozen copy of the customer data (mDB) at the time of the session.
| Export option | Use case |
| Without LUI data | Share the transcript for review; lightweight |
| With LUI data | Full reproducibility; recreates the exact data state |
The ZIP format is compatible with the Evaluation module's import function.
Production conversations can be imported directly into the Evaluation workspace as test cases:
This closes the quality loop - real production failures become regression tests, ensuring the same issue cannot recur undetected. See Data Snapshots and Production Import for the full workflow.